ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify trends in female pediatric ophthalmologist authorship and representation at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Annual Meeting from 2018 to 2022. METHODS: Participant data from 2018 to 2022 were collected from the AAO website, organized by conference activity (papers, posters, instruction courses, videos, symposia, subspecialty day, and awards), and analyzed by sex using an online tool. Chi-squared and odds ratio analyses were performed to determine trends in authorship sex and associations between the sex of paper and poster authors in each category. RESULTS: Of 923 pediatric ophthalmology presentations from 2018 to 2022, 46.2% (426 of 923) of presenters and 46.6% (281 of 603) of unique individual participants were women. Overall, 48% (174 of 362) of first and senior authors of papers and posters were women. No significant difference or association between female first and senior authors was observed (52% vs 44%, P = .14; odds ratio 1.59, P = .13). There was no significant change in the proportion of total female presenters from 2018 to 2019 (-3.09%, P = .53), 2019 to 2020 (0.76%, P = .88), 2020 to 2021 (9.09%, P = .09), 2021 to 2022 (-5.68%, P = .30), or 2018 to 2022 (1.08%, P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: Since 2018, female representation at the AAO Annual Meeting has remained consistent and nears 50%. The lack of a significant difference between the proportion of female first and senior authors suggests that junior female pediatric ophthalmologists are climbing the ranks and more broadly engaging in mentorship roles. Considering the increasing proportion of female pediatric ophthalmologists, the absence of corollary, statistically significant increases in female participation may be of concern. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(1):6-13.].
Subject(s)
Ophthalmologists , Ophthalmology , Humans , Female , United States , Child , Male , AuthorshipABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Our study investigates whether preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Scheimpflug tomography could serve as a potential predictor of graft failure in eyes undergoing Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent primary or repeat DSEK between January 2020 and August 2021 at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Charts from 378 primary and 192 repeat DSEK patients were reviewed and ultimately 47 primary and 21 repeat DSEK patients met criteria for inclusion. Data collection included demographics, preoperative ACD, best-corrected visual acuity, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: Demographics were similar between groups, and there was no significant difference in the average best-corrected visual acuity between the single and repeat DSEK groups preoperatively. Baseline preoperative ACD was greatest in the single DSEK group (3.51 ± 0.90 mm) when compared to baseline preoperative ACD in the repeat DSEK group (3.01 ± 0.67 mm, P = 0.003). The preoperative mean ACD was smallest in the repeat DSEK group before the second DSEK (2.94 ± 0.48 mm, P = 0.001). Preoperative baseline ACD was the only variable to affect graft survival time significantly (P = 0.012). The incidence of glaucoma diagnosis was similar in both groups (42.5% vs. 42.8%, P = 0.471). The diagnosis of glaucoma and presence of incisional glaucoma surgery did not affect the graft survival time (P = 0.129, P = 0.559) or need for repeat DSEK. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller baseline preoperative Scheimpflug ACD measurement may be a possible predictor of the need for repeat DSEK. Our study found that Scheimpflug ACD decreases with subsequent DSEK failure.
